Validatum® works solely with the ‘sell’ side of legal services. Over the last few years, we have had the opportunity to work with a wide range of law firms and barrister’s chambers with turnovers of £10 million ($US15m) to £1.26b ($US1.9b). Our clients are regional, national, international, boutique, full-service, and in multiple jurisdictions including the United Kingdom, Europe, North America, Asia, Africa and Australasia. This diversity provides us with deep insight into current legal services pricing best practice. Here are just a few of the clients with whom we have worked...
✓ You have successfully signed up to our Newsletter
␡ There was an error and you were not signed up to the Newsletter
Latest Articles and Events
With Validatum Pricing Espresso® we aim to bring you your regular pricing 'shot' - the best, most interesting, thought provoking and informative material we can find globally which will be of interest, relevance and help to you in your legal services pricing challenges. [Note: we don't always agree with the content of others that we post but the philosophy of Validatum Pricing Espresso® is shared perspectives, not a personal 'soap-box']
Last week, in our 2nd instalment in our blog series ‘Planning for the RFP storm’, we talked about the types of questions firms should be asking themselves and the pre-work that can be done prior to RFP issue. In this, our final article, I’m going to talk about bid triage – deciding whether or not to respond to an RFP. It’s an unexpectedly sensitive topic.
In part 2 of this 3-part weekly series, I will get into more detail on what that checklist looks like and why. Last week, we began this 3-part series with what we see as a major, systemic and permanent rise in the use of RFPs which many firms are struggling to adequately resource yet still achieve acceptable win rates and margins.